7 category composites vs sector median benchmark (50)
Final composites blend multiple category scores with research-backed weights. Click any composite to see which categories drive the score.
final composite · weighted avg with penalty 0.95
Fundamental beta derived from 8 accounting-based risk factors (Beaver-Kettler-Scholes framework). β > 1 = riskier than market average. Positive contributions increase systematic risk exposure.
Moat Trajectory: ▲ STRONG — Widening
Durability score of 72/100 combined with growth consistency of 88/100 suggests the company is actively widening its competitive moat. This is rare and indicates structural advantages.
Capital Deployment:
Capital allocation is competent (returns: 60/100, profitability: 71/100). Management is generating adequate returns without exceptional value creation.
ROIC of 11.1% is above the sector benchmark of 10%, indicating adequate capital efficiency.
Earnings Quality Deep Dive:
Earnings quality is excellent. OCF/NI of 311% indicates cash generation exceeds reported earnings by 211pp — the gold standard for earnings reliability. Accruals ratio of -28.4% is well-contained.
Piotroski F-Score of 5/9: Mixed — some fundamental concerns present.
Balance Sheet Reality:
The balance sheet shows some strain. Leverage composite of 77/100 combined with liquidity at 30/100 suggests the company is operating with tighter financial constraints.
D/E of 0.01x is conservative, with strong interest coverage (82.9x).
Investment Profile: QUALITY YIELD
Solid quality (health: 67/100) combined with meaningful shareholder yield (25.0%). Suitable for income-oriented portfolios seeking quality over pure yield.
Leading Indicators to Monitor:
Comparing current quarter composite scores vs prior quarter, with year-over-year financial metrics.
No new risks detected this quarter
No material improvements this quarter