7 category composites vs sector median benchmark (50)
Final composites blend multiple category scores with research-backed weights. Click any composite to see which categories drive the score.
final composite · weighted avg with penalty 0.95
Fundamental beta derived from 8 accounting-based risk factors (Beaver-Kettler-Scholes framework). β > 1 = riskier than market average. Positive contributions increase systematic risk exposure.
Moat Trajectory: ◆ MODERATE — Stable
With durability at 65/100 and growth consistency at 62/100, the company maintains its competitive position without clear widening or narrowing.
Capital Deployment:
The company excels at capital allocation, with a returns composite of 97/100 and profitability composite of 78/100. This suggests management is deploying capital into high-return projects while maintaining pricing discipline.
ROIC of 63.9% meaningfully exceeds the sector benchmark of 10%, suggesting genuine competitive advantages.
Earnings Quality Deep Dive:
Earnings quality is adequate but not exceptional. OCF/NI of 100% means 0% of earnings aren't converting to cash.
Piotroski F-Score of 7/9: Good — majority of financial health indicators are positive.
Balance Sheet Reality:
The balance sheet shows some strain. Leverage composite of 58/100 combined with liquidity at 41/100 suggests the company is operating with tighter financial constraints.
D/E of 1.00x is conservative, with interest expense not separately reported in recent filings.
▸ Active Penalty Flags:
▼ Capex Starvation: The company is underinvesting relative to depreciation, which may impair future competitiveness.
Investment Profile: QUALITY YIELD
Solid quality (health: 63/100) combined with meaningful shareholder yield (3.7%). Suitable for income-oriented portfolios seeking quality over pure yield.
Leading Indicators to Monitor:
Comparing current quarter composite scores vs prior quarter, with year-over-year financial metrics.
No new risks detected this quarter
No material improvements this quarter