7 category composites vs sector median benchmark (50)
Final composites blend multiple category scores with research-backed weights. Click any composite to see which categories drive the score.
final composite · weighted avg with penalty 0.85
Fundamental beta derived from 8 accounting-based risk factors (Beaver-Kettler-Scholes framework). β > 1 = riskier than market average. Positive contributions increase systematic risk exposure.
Moat Trajectory: ◆ MODERATE — Mixed
The competitive picture is nuanced. Durability (37/100) and growth consistency (33/100) give mixed signals about moat trajectory.
Capital Deployment:
Capital deployment raises concerns (returns: 56/100, profitability: 43/100). The company may be over-investing in low-return projects or facing structural profitability challenges.
ROIC of 15.7% meaningfully exceeds the sector benchmark of 10%, suggesting genuine competitive advantages.
Earnings Quality Deep Dive:
Earnings quality is excellent. OCF/NI of 158% indicates cash generation exceeds reported earnings by 58pp — the gold standard for earnings reliability. Accruals ratio of 3.0% is well-contained.
Piotroski F-Score of 5/9: Mixed — some fundamental concerns present.
Balance Sheet Reality:
The balance sheet shows some strain. Leverage composite of 78/100 combined with liquidity at 45/100 suggests the company is operating with tighter financial constraints.
D/E of 0.01x is conservative, with strong interest coverage (18.7x).
▸ Active Penalty Flags:
▼ Dilution Tax Active: Share count has grown 12.6% over 3 years, eroding per-share economics. SBC/Revenue: 0.7%.
Investment Profile: TURNAROUND
Below-average health (37/100) but positive growth (152.8%) suggests potential turnaround in progress. Higher risk, position size accordingly.
Leading Indicators to Monitor:
Comparing current quarter composite scores vs prior quarter, with year-over-year financial metrics.
No new risks detected this quarter
No material improvements this quarter