7 category composites vs sector median benchmark (50)
Final composites blend multiple category scores with research-backed weights. Click any composite to see which categories drive the score.
final composite · weighted average renormalized
Fundamental beta derived from 8 accounting-based risk factors (Beaver-Kettler-Scholes framework). β > 1 = riskier than market average. Positive contributions increase systematic risk exposure.
Moat Trajectory: ▸ CAUTION — Under Pressure
Durability of 68/100 with growth consistency at 25/100 signals emerging competitive pressures that may erode the business's defensibility over time.
Capital Deployment:
Capital allocation is competent (returns: 54/100, profitability: 59/100). Management is generating adequate returns without exceptional value creation.
ROIC of 6.5% is below the sector benchmark of 10%, suggesting capital deployment challenges.
Earnings Quality Deep Dive:
Earnings quality is excellent. OCF/NI of 2000% indicates cash generation exceeds reported earnings by 1900pp — the gold standard for earnings reliability. Accruals ratio of -26.2% is well-contained.
Piotroski F-Score of 5/9: Mixed — some fundamental concerns present.
Balance Sheet Reality:
The balance sheet shows some strain. Leverage composite of 77/100 combined with liquidity at 31/100 suggests the company is operating with tighter financial constraints.
D/E of 0.00x is conservative, with adequate interest coverage (9.1x).
Investment Profile: CASH COW
Mature, cash-generative business (CF composite: 99/100) with limited growth (3.4%). Value play with strong cash flow characteristics. Position: Income/value sleeve.
Leading Indicators to Monitor:
Comparing current quarter composite scores vs prior quarter, with year-over-year financial metrics.
No new risks detected this quarter
No material improvements this quarter
Insufficient data for YoY comparison